1) That the price of decay was constant throughout time. 2). That the isotope abundances into the specimen dated haven’t been modified during its history by addition or elimination of either moms and dad or child isotopes 3) that whenever the stone first formed it included a known amount of child product (“Radioisotopes while the chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg v)
We should notice that past processes may never be occurring after all today, and that some might have happened at prices and intensities far distinctive from comparable procedures today. ( “Radioisotopes in addition to chronilogical age of the planet earth” pg vii)
Jesus cursed the bottom (the rocks too!)
See my commentary on Genesis 3 verse 17 “..cursed may be the ground for the benefit”
Whenever this took place there clearly was a burst of radioactity that made the stones look avove the age of these were.
Would not this make most of the rocks appear the exact same age?
“The stone real question is fairly easy and has now related to the elements that are basic composed these stones at first. Whenever all these elements, uranium, potassium, radium etc. Continue reading Dating methods are derived from 3 unprovable and assumptions that are questionable